Request of AGA and APGA for an Extension of the Comment Period Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (SNOPR) – Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnaces – Docket No. EERE-2014-STD-

09-12-2016 15:48

Dear Mr. Cymbalsky: The American Gas Association (“AGA”)1 and the American Public Gas Association (“APGA”)2 (collectively, the “Associations”) respectfully request an extension of time for filing comments on the Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“SNOPR”) on Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnaces released in pre-publication form by the Department of Energy (“DOE”) on September 2, 2016.3 Specifically, the Associations request an extension of the proposed thirty (30) day comment period for an additional sixty (60) days, for a total of a ninety (90) day comment period from the date of publication of the SNOPR in the Federal Register. This comment period extension is necessary to provide the Associations and all other interested stakeholders with time to review the extensive (almost 500 pages) SNOPR text, as well as the massive and very complex Technical Support Document (almost 1200 pages) and accompanying spreadsheets (exceeding 6,000 pages) (collectively, “TSD”), in order to provide meaningful comments to DOE on the SNOPR. Additionally, the Associations request prompt action by the DOE on this extension request. Specifically, we request that DOE issue a decision on the comment deadline extension no later than seven (7) days after the date of this request. A prompt and publicized notification of DOE’s decision on this request will assist interested stakeholders to appropriately manage the time constraints associated with the review, analysis and drafting of meaningful comments.4 As noted in the SNOPR (at pp. 37-40, 451-53), this proceeding has a long history.5 That history underscores the importance of getting it right this time, which includes affording the parties ample time to assess the SNOPR and react in a meaningful fashion. Understanding what DOE has done in the SNOPR and its reasons therefor will require in-depth analysis by experts in the field and, given the 10,000 trial cases involved, innumerable computer runs. DOE devoted huge amounts of time to developing the March 2015 NOPR, which has now been superseded some sixteen (16) months later by the SNOPR. The notion that interested parties can react to the SNOPR and accompanying TSD within thirty (30) days, or even double that time, is patently wrong. The subject request to be allowed ninety (90) days for review and comment is conservative by any measure. The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. § 6295(p)(2)) provides that after publication of a proposed rulemaking, the Secretary shall “afford interested persons an opportunity, during a period of not less than 60 days,” to present comments.6 Clearly, the “not less than” language of the statute and Executive Order 12866 anticipate longer time periods for cases of this magnitude and complexity. DOE’s own regulations provide for time periods of at least seventy-five (75) days after an ANOPR7 and seventy-five (75) days after a NOPR for comments.8 Our working assumption is that DOE seeks to build a full and fair record,9 which can only be accomplished in the context of this proceeding if ample time is provided for review of and response to the SNOPR, consistent with the enabling statute and DOE’s own regulations. The requested ninety (90) day extension also fits well with the planned October 17, 2016 public meeting regarding the SNOPR (SNOPR at p. 2). The key purpose of such a meeting is for the public to understand what DOE is proposing and why, which serves as an important predicate for subsequently filed comments. The requested ninety (90) day comment period will provide parties both an opportunity to prepare for the public meeting and then, upon review of the meeting transcript, to use that knowledge in filing comments with DOE. The current comment period would frustrate both purposes. The issuance of the NODA in September 2015 underscores the need for more time to respond to the SNOPR. DOE made clear that the NODA was based on a “provisional analysis of the potential economic impacts and energy savings that could result from promulgating amended … standards … that include two product classes defined by input capacity”10 and that if DOE determined to proposed new standards, it would issue a supplemental NOPR along with the necessary technical support document. Approximately one year later, the SNOPR and TSD issued,11 the massiveness of which has already been noted. DOE has spent the time it thought was necessary to promulgate the SNOPR, and it is only fair, if notice and comment rulemaking is to serve its intended purpose, for the parties to be granted sufficient time to understand the notice (i.e., the SNOPR and TSD) and to comment accordingly. For the reasons stated herein, the Associations respectfully request that DOE promptly grant an extension of time to file comments on the SNOPR to a comment deadline of ninety (90) days after publication in the Federal Register. In order to provide adequate notice and prioritize resource needs, the Associations urge the DOE to issue an order on this request no later than seven (7) days from the date of this request.

#APGACorrespondence #2016Correspondence #DOEfurnace #furnacerule

0 Favorited
1 Files
PDF file
160912 Joint Request for Extension of Comment Period Re F...PDF   292K   1 version
Uploaded - 09-12-2016

Tags and Keywords

Related Entries and Links

No Related Resource entered.